<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Pensions Investments Research Consultants - news and commentary.</title>
      <link>http://www.pirc.co.uk/</link>
      <description>pirc.co.uk - news and commentary on Corporate Governance Issues of the day.</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2006</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>2008-07-25T06:00:01.937000</lastBuildDate>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

      <item>
    <title>Seeking Tomorrows Investor</title> 
<description>
<![CDATA[ 
<p>Last week saw the launch of an interesting new
initiative looking at the corporate world from the
perspective of an ordinary investor. The
Tomorrows Investor project is being led by the
RSA as part of its Tomorrows Business
workstream and seeks to explore the largely
passive nature of share-ownership as
experienced by ordinary investors.</p>
  ]]> 
  </description>
  <link>http://www.pirc.co.uk/news/story238.html</link> 
  <category>Global Corporate Governance</category> 
  <pubDate>2008-07-25T06:00:01.937000</pubDate>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>But which owners to answer to?</title> 
<description>
<![CDATA[ 
<p>While the RSA is looking at the role of
individuals as shareholders and there role in the
corporate system, one veteran governance
campaigner has warned that changes in the
nature of the ownership of companies are
having a significant impact on corporate
governance. In his recent Charkham Memorial
Lecture, Ira Millstein explored the challenges
that new developments in the capital markets
posed for both companies and investors.</p>
  ]]> 
  </description>
  <link>http://www.pirc.co.uk/news/story239.html</link> 
  <category>Global Corporate Governance</category> 
  <pubDate>2008-07-25T06:00:01.937000</pubDate>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>Japanese season in review</title> 
<description>
<![CDATA[ 
<p>This year has seen a notable cooling of attitudes
towards shareholder activism at Japanese
companies. In previous years activism has been
spearheaded by US investors who appear more
willing to engage with the companies in which
they are invested than their Japanese
counterparts but also more willing to trade their
shares for perceived underperformance.
Although a quarter of Japanese shares are
owned by non-Japanese investors they account
for over 60% of the trades volumes. CalPERS
and other influential US investors warned in
June 2008 of the need for Japan to improve its
system of corporate governance or risk further
damage to investor confidence in investing in
the country, and the economic costs associated
with this.</p>
  ]]> 
  </description>
  <link>http://www.pirc.co.uk/news/story240.html</link> 
  <category>Global Corporate Governance</category> 
  <pubDate>2008-07-25T06:00:01.937000</pubDate>
  </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
